$L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (2024)

Physical Review Research

  • Welcome
  • Recent
  • Subjects
  • Accepted
  • Collections
  • Authors
  • Referees
  • Search
  • About
  • Scope
  • Editorial Team
  • Open Access

L-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, d bands, and spin-orbit interaction

Fabian Schöttke, Peter Krüger, Lutz Hammer, Tilman Kißlinger, M. Alexander Schneider, and Markus Donath
Phys. Rev. Research 6, 023314 – Published 24 June 2024
  • Article
  • References
  • No Citing Articles
  • Supplemental Material

PDFHTMLExport Citation

$L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (1)

Abstract
Authors
Article Text
  • INTRODUCTION
  • ATOMIC STRUCTURE
  • ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE
  • CONCLUSION
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • Supplemental Material
    References

    $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (2)

    Abstract

    Pt(111) hosts a surface resonance with peculiar properties concerning energy vs momentum dispersion and spin texture. At variance with the free-electron-like behavior of the L-gap Shockley-type surface states on the fcc(111) surfaces of Au, Ag, and Cu, it splits into several branches with distinct spin polarization around the center of the surface Brillouin zone Γ¯. Theoretical predictions based on density-functional theory vary depending on the particular functionals used. To clarify this issue, we investigate the atomic structure of Pt(111) by low-energy electron diffraction and the unoccupied electronic structure by spin- and angle-resolved inverse photoemission. The experimental results are backed by theoretical studies using different functionals, which show that the characteristics of the surface band depend critically on the lattice constant. From the analysis of the energy-dependent low-energy electron diffraction intensities, we derive structural parameters of the Pt(111) surface relaxation with high accuracy. In addition, we give an unambiguous definition of the nonequivalent mirror-plane directions Γ¯M¯ and Γ¯M¯ at fcc(111) surfaces, which is consistent with band-structure calculations and inverse-photoemission data. Concerning the surface resonance at the bottom of the L gap, we identified a delicate interplay of several contributions. Lattice constant, hybridization with d bands, and the influence of spin-orbit interaction are critical ingredients for understanding the peculiar energy dispersion and spin character of the unoccupied surface resonance.

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (3)
    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (4)
    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (5)
    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (6)
    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (7)
    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (8)
    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (9)

    1 More

    • Received 29 February 2024
    • Accepted 24 May 2024

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023314

    $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (10)

    Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

    Published by the American Physical Society

    1. Research Areas

    Electronic structureSpin-orbit couplingSurface states

    1. Physical Systems

    Elemental metalsFace-centered cubic

    1. Techniques

    Current-voltage low-energy electron diffractionDensity functional theoryGGAInverse photoemission spectroscopyLDA

    Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

    Authors & Affiliations

    Fabian Schöttke1,*, Peter Krüger2, Lutz Hammer3, Tilman Kißlinger3, M. Alexander Schneider3, and Markus Donath1,†

    • *Contact author: fabian.schoettke@uni-muenster.de
    • Contact author: markus.donath@uni-muenster.de

    Article Text

    Click to Expand

    Supplemental Material

    Click to Expand

    References

    Click to Expand

    Issue

    Vol. 6, Iss. 2 — June - August 2024

    Subject Areas
    • Condensed Matter Physics
    $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (11)
    Reuse & Permissions
    $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (14)

    Authorization Required

    Other Options
    • Buy Article »
    • Find an Institution with the Article »

    ×

    Download & Share

    PDFExportReuse & Permissions

    ×

    Images

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (15)

      Figure 1

      (a)Ball model of the Pt(111) surface in side view (z scale exaggerated) with relaxation of layer spacings (in percent of the bulk layer distance) derived from the LEED-I(V) analysis (red) compared with the predictions of DFT (LDA: green; PW91-GGA: blue). (b)Selection of experimental I(V) spectra for various beams with their counterparts calculated for the best fit structural model. The R factor values denote the quality of the single beam correspondence. (c)Error curves displaying the R factor increase with a vertical shift of single layers from their best fit position. The range below the R+var(R) line is an estimate for the statistical error of the determined vertical positions of layers.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (16)

      Figure 2

      (a)Real-space sketch of the fcc(111) surface with first (yellow) and second (red) layer, and crystallographic directions. (b)The fcc reciprocal structure (purple truncated octahedron) with projection to the (111) surface Brillouin zone (yellow). (c)LEED pattern of Pt(111) with (1|0) and (0|1) diffraction spots and overlayed surface Brillouin zone. (d)Measured LEED-I(V) spectra of the (1|0) and (0|1) diffraction spots [see Fig.1]. The dashed red line marks the energy of the LEED pattern in (c), indicating the observed intensity difference.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (17)

      Figure 3

      Angle-resolved IPE spectra of Pt(111) along the high-symmetry directions (a)Γ¯M¯, (b)Γ¯M¯, and (c)Γ¯K¯. The blue and purple lines connect spectral features attributed to transitions into the surface resonance SR and image-potential state IS, respectively. The black lines indicate features from transitions into bulk states B1–B8. The wide gray lines indicate non-k-conserving transitions to d bands.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (18)

      Figure 4

      Energy vs k dispersion of electronic states at Pt(111) along Γ¯M¯ (left) and Γ¯M¯ (right). Squares represent peak positions of experimental spectra from Figs.3, 3. The golden-shaded areas display the calculated surface-projected bulk band structure. The brown dots represent calculated and k-selected transitions to bulk states with vector potential along A[111] (see text for details). Yellow dots represent transitions with A[2¯11] and green dots transitions with A[01¯1]. The size of the dots is proportional to the transition probability.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (19)

      Figure 5

      (a)IPE spectra of the image-potential state IS at Pt(111) for various angles of electron incidence θ along M¯Γ¯M¯. Black lines are fits to the data (see text for details.) (b)E(k) dispersion of IS with a parabolic fit to the data resulting in an effective mass of m*/me=1.21±0.05 and a binding energy EB=EVE=0.55±0.07eV. For comparison, the dashed gray line shows the free-electron parabola (m*/me=1).

      Reuse & Permissions

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (20)

      Figure 6

      Theoretical data from DFT calculations in (a)PW91-GGA and (b)LDA. Gray lines represent results from the slab calculation and golden-shaded areas the surface projected bulk band structure. The L-gap surface feature is shown with its up and down spin polarization as red and blue dots. The symbol size is proportional to the expectation value of the Rashba spin-polarization direction as defined in the inset of (b). The paths for IPE measurements at θ=±2 are shown as thin black lines.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (21)

      Figure 7

      Theoretical data from DFT calculations in (a)PW91-GGA and (b)LDA as a function of the lattice constant a. Displayed are the energetic positions of the SR branches (with their spin polarization) and of the d bands at a k value that corresponds to θ=2 along Γ¯M¯. Symbols and colors have the same meaning as in Fig.6.

      Reuse & Permissions

    • $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (22)

      Figure 8

      (a)–(c)Simplified sketches of the L-gap surface states and d bands at (a)Au(111) [5, 7], (b)Ni(111) [64], and (c)Pt(111) [data from Fig.6]. Red and blue lines in (a)and (c)denote the Rashba-type spin polarization as defined in Fig.6. Red and green colors in (b)indicate minority and majority spin directions, respectively. (d)Spin- and angle-resolved IPE spectra of Pt(111) along Γ¯M¯. Red (blue) triangles indicate spin up (down). The spectra for θ=+2[θ=2] are enlarged in (e) [(f)] and presented with the corresponding spin asymmetry.

      Reuse & Permissions

    ×

    $L$-gap surface resonance at Pt(111): Influence of atomic structure, $d$ bands, and spin-orbit interaction (2024)

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Moshe Kshlerin

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6296

    Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

    Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Moshe Kshlerin

    Birthday: 1994-01-25

    Address: Suite 609 315 Lupita Unions, Ronnieburgh, MI 62697

    Phone: +2424755286529

    Job: District Education Designer

    Hobby: Yoga, Gunsmithing, Singing, 3D printing, Nordic skating, Soapmaking, Juggling

    Introduction: My name is Moshe Kshlerin, I am a gleaming, attractive, outstanding, pleasant, delightful, outstanding, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.